In recent years, intellectual property (IP) enforcement in Vietnam has ceased to be a topic reserved for large conglomerates. With the boom of e-commerce, social media, and livestream selling, infringements occur faster, spread wider, and are increasingly difficult to trace. A brand that has just been professionally launched may be “copied” within weeks; a distinctive packaging design may be replicated at scale; and costly marketing content may be re-uploaded, edited, and exploited without authorization across multiple platforms.
Notably, many businesses have registered trademarks, industrial designs, or copyrights yet still struggle when infringements are discovered. The reason often lies in the absence of a clear enforcement strategy—selecting the right mechanism (administrative, civil, or criminal), standardizing evidence, identifying the right targets, and implementing a roadmap to prevent repeat infringement.
1) What is IP enforcement, and why should businesses act early?
IP enforcement refers to the rights holder’s use of legal tools to prevent, stop, and remedy infringement (e.g., halting the sale of counterfeit goods, taking down infringing content, recalling and destroying infringing products, and claiming damages). If a business only registers IP rights but does not enforce them, it typically faces three major risks:
- First, loss of market share and revenue: counterfeit and copycat products often compete on price, distort fair competition, and divert customers away from official channels.
- Second, reputational harm: when consumers cannot distinguish genuine products from fakes, negative experiences are often attributed to the original brand.
- Third, the practical risk of “losing” rights in the marketplace: if infringement persists, the distinctiveness of the mark may be diluted and confusion may increase, making future enforcement more difficult and costly.
For these reasons, IP enforcement should be viewed as part of brand governance—similar to channel management, legal risk management, and communications management.
2) Common forms of infringement in Vietnam today
In practice, IP infringement is not limited to trademark counterfeiting. Businesses commonly encounter:
(i) Counterfeits and trademark infringement: affixing identical or confusingly similar signs on products, packaging, online storefronts, or advertisements.
(ii) Copying trade dress/packaging: not using the exact trademark, but imitating colors, layouts, and imagery to create the impression of being “like the genuine product.”
(iii) Misappropriation of trademarks in the digital environment: using trademarks as account names, fanpage names, or shop names; running ads based on brand keywords.
(iv) Copyright infringement: copying images, videos, content, or advertising scripts; re-uploading content on other platforms to monetize.
3) What enforcement “routes” are available to businesses?
In Vietnam, IP enforcement is commonly pursued through three main tools: administrative, civil, and criminal measures.
3.1. Administrative measures
This is the most common option when a business needs to stop infringement quickly, especially for tangible goods circulating in the market (warehouses, retail points, shelves). Key advantages include speed and the ability to apply direct sanctions such as fines, seizure, mandatory destruction of infringing goods, and orders to cease the infringing act.
The limitations are that businesses often do not obtain damages as expected, and long-term deterrence depends on whether enforcement targets the source (the “upstream” supply chain) rather than only addressing the visible endpoints.
3.2. Civil measures
If the goal is to recover damages, to obtain a binding court judgment ordering cessation of infringement, or to resolve complex disputes (e.g., those involving both IP and contract/franchise issues), civil proceedings are often more suitable.
However, effective civil enforcement requires strong preparation in terms of evidence, quantification of damages, proof of unjust profits, and litigation strategy. This route should be considered as part of a broader enforcement campaign, rather than a last resort after it is already too late.
3.3. Criminal measures
For serious, organized operations involving the production and distribution of counterfeit or infringing goods, criminal measures can provide strong deterrence. Nevertheless, due to higher legal thresholds, strict evidentiary requirements, and the need to coordinate with multiple authorities, businesses should carefully assess feasibility before pursuing this route.
4) Basic steps for IP enforcement
Step 1: Review the legal foundation of the rights and the “chain of title”
Before taking action, clarify whether the rights have been registered/proven, who the correct rights holder is, whether a power of attorney is required, and whether the protection scope matches the sign and the relevant goods/services. This seemingly straightforward step often explains why many cases are delayed.
Step 2: Prioritize targets
Enforcement should not be scattered. A practical approach is to categorize targets into three groups:
(1) suppliers/warehouses/primary sources (highest impact),
(2) key sellers (high volume, strong livestream presence), and
(3) small-scale sellers (handled in batches to clean up the market).
When resources are limited, prioritize groups (1) and (2).
Step 3: Collect “enforcement-ready” evidence
Evidence should answer three questions: Who is infringing? What is being infringed? Where/how is the infringement taking place?
For online infringements, evidence typically includes links, photos/videos, chat history, shop information, invoices/receipts, and, critically, test purchases to demonstrate specific infringing goods. For offline infringements, the focus is on identifying addresses, warehouses, distribution routes, invoices (if available), and product samples.
To enable rapid action, businesses should prepare a “ready-to-enforce” package including: registration certificates (if any), proof of use, the official product portfolio, genuine-vs-fake identification guidelines, distribution channel policies, and a list of infringing links/points of sale. It is also important to appoint an internal contact with authority to confirm genuineness and respond quickly—speed is a key factor in enforcement, particularly online.
Step 4: Strategy assessment
- If the goal is to stop infringement quickly, consider a warning letter/cease-and-desist (where appropriate) and prioritize administrative action. A warning letter can be effective to end infringement quickly and demonstrate good faith; however, in certain cases—especially counterfeiting—sending a letter too early may prompt the infringer to move inventory or erase traces. Timing is therefore strategic.
- If the goal is to cut off the source, prioritize upstream targets (suppliers/warehouses) and inter-agency coordination.
- If the goal is damages and long-term deterrence, add civil action to the plan. For serious cases, assess criminal options.
Enforcement is not purely legal. Businesses should align legal, sales, marketing, and customer service teams—guiding consumers to identify genuine products, communicating official channels, and issuing appropriate consumer warnings.
Step 5: Post-enforcement monitoring and repeat-infringement prevention
In the digital environment, repeat infringement happens quickly: cloned accounts, mirror listings, platform migration, and product renaming to evade keywords. Businesses should establish periodic monitoring, a watchlist of targets, and a rapid response process.
Conclusion
IP enforcement in Vietnam is ultimately a matter of strategy and evidence. The earlier a business prepares—by securing the right IP protection, systematizing documentation, and establishing monitoring mechanisms—the easier it is to act quickly and reduce long-term costs. When infringement is detected, instead of responding in a fragmented manner, businesses should follow a structured roadmap: prioritize targets, strengthen evidence, choose the right tool, strike the source, and conduct post-enforcement monitoring to prevent recurrence. This approach helps businesses protect not only their legal rights but also the long-term value of their brands.
______________________
Should you have any inquiries, please do not hesitate to contact us.
𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟗 𝐋𝐀𝐖
Website: 1989law.vn
Hotline: (+84) 945.45.45.11
Address: 18th Floor, The Nexus Building, 3A – 3B Ton Duc Thang Street, Saigon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam